<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morals and Genre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Nature of Enjoyment (feat. Ange Ushiromiya) &#171; Anime wa Bakuhatsu da!</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Nature of Enjoyment (feat. Ange Ushiromiya) &#171; Anime wa Bakuhatsu da!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-316</guid>
		<description>[...] the Dread Word &#8220;Entertaining&#8221;. The observation of this perception is hardly news as it&#8217;s been going on for roughly two centuries (give or take some decades), but there&#8217;s more to it than Sturgeonesque bitterness towards the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Dread Word &#8220;Entertaining&#8221;. The observation of this perception is hardly news as it&#8217;s been going on for roughly two centuries (give or take some decades), but there&#8217;s more to it than Sturgeonesque bitterness towards the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuchlann</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuchlann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-237</guid>
		<description>@IKnight:  if Aldiss&#039; history is to be taken seriously (and despite its faults I think it does a functional job on the broad view), SF turned to &quot;pulpy&quot; fiction in the thirties, when Hugo Gernsback got ahold of several magazines and started exercising his weird requirements.  The sixties, in turn, is when it really starts to come around, with a new focus on the humanistic, &quot;soft&quot; sciences and more attempts at stylistic effects -- the New Wave, in short.  

And I know very little about crime writing.  I&#039;m reading a selection of Holmes stories and essays right now -- I&#039;ve read the stories innumerable times before, but the essays will be new.  Apparently, according to the intro., one attempts to place Holmes in relation to the contemporary supposition that it was &quot;realistic.&quot;

@gwern:  I haven&#039;t read The Dispossessed yet.  I will eventually, I imagine.  I have read Wizard of Earthsea and Lathe of Heaven.  Le Guin is good, but I&#039;m often a little disappointed as well.  She tries too hard, it seems to me; never mind that Earthsea is ragingly racist.  

And a lot of the Cold War stuff falls flat now.  If you want an example that still holds up, try out Stanislaw Lem&#039;s His Master&#039;s Voice.  The book&#039;s only partly about the Cold War, but even those parts are great.

Regarding the Wolfe quotation, that&#039;s what I had meant to get across; thanks for providing the full quotation.  It is a literary genre, as all genres really are are ways to classify things, and that&#039;s a classification.  I believe most MFA types don&#039;t even want to believe that, though; they seem to cling onto some desire for &quot;literary&quot; fiction to be not a classification, but ALL.  Everything there is to write is in &quot;literary&quot; fiction, and everything else doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@IKnight:  if Aldiss&#8217; history is to be taken seriously (and despite its faults I think it does a functional job on the broad view), SF turned to &#8220;pulpy&#8221; fiction in the thirties, when Hugo Gernsback got ahold of several magazines and started exercising his weird requirements.  The sixties, in turn, is when it really starts to come around, with a new focus on the humanistic, &#8220;soft&#8221; sciences and more attempts at stylistic effects &#8212; the New Wave, in short.  </p>
<p>And I know very little about crime writing.  I&#8217;m reading a selection of Holmes stories and essays right now &#8212; I&#8217;ve read the stories innumerable times before, but the essays will be new.  Apparently, according to the intro., one attempts to place Holmes in relation to the contemporary supposition that it was &#8220;realistic.&#8221;</p>
<p>@gwern:  I haven&#8217;t read The Dispossessed yet.  I will eventually, I imagine.  I have read Wizard of Earthsea and Lathe of Heaven.  Le Guin is good, but I&#8217;m often a little disappointed as well.  She tries too hard, it seems to me; never mind that Earthsea is ragingly racist.  </p>
<p>And a lot of the Cold War stuff falls flat now.  If you want an example that still holds up, try out Stanislaw Lem&#8217;s His Master&#8217;s Voice.  The book&#8217;s only partly about the Cold War, but even those parts are great.</p>
<p>Regarding the Wolfe quotation, that&#8217;s what I had meant to get across; thanks for providing the full quotation.  It is a literary genre, as all genres really are are ways to classify things, and that&#8217;s a classification.  I believe most MFA types don&#8217;t even want to believe that, though; they seem to cling onto some desire for &#8220;literary&#8221; fiction to be not a classification, but ALL.  Everything there is to write is in &#8220;literary&#8221; fiction, and everything else doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwern</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>gwern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Actually, Wolfe was criticizing realism (as in, the sort of stuff one might read in the New Yorker); this is what he said:


   GW: The adventurous reader has probably already moved past realism. I
   realize that sounds like a smart remark, but I mean past the kind of
   fiction that is called &quot;realism&quot; as a literary genre, and that&#039;s what it
   is: a literary genre. It is archtypically the story about the college
   professor who is married to the other college professor.

   Did you read [3]Ursula K. LeGuin&#039;s novel, [4]The Dispossessed? It was
   about the college professor who&#039;s married to a college professor, only
   science fiction, and this planet is Russia and this planet is the United
   States. When I read it I was so disappointed. I&#039;d had a dozen people tell
   me how wonderful it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Wolfe was criticizing realism (as in, the sort of stuff one might read in the New Yorker); this is what he said:</p>
<p>   GW: The adventurous reader has probably already moved past realism. I<br />
   realize that sounds like a smart remark, but I mean past the kind of<br />
   fiction that is called &#8220;realism&#8221; as a literary genre, and that&#8217;s what it<br />
   is: a literary genre. It is archtypically the story about the college<br />
   professor who is married to the other college professor.</p>
<p>   Did you read [3]Ursula K. LeGuin&#8217;s novel, [4]The Dispossessed? It was<br />
   about the college professor who&#8217;s married to a college professor, only<br />
   science fiction, and this planet is Russia and this planet is the United<br />
   States. When I read it I was so disappointed. I&#8217;d had a dozen people tell<br />
   me how wonderful it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IKnight</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>IKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Hmm. That sounds possible. There was certainly a line of people like Wells, Huxley and Orwell who could write sf which was taken seriously by their contemporaries: you find Chesterton attempting to refute what he sees as Wells&#039;s worldview, for example. As late as the sixties Lewis is claiming that the &lt;em&gt;Divine Comedy&lt;/em&gt; is science fiction. I also think people are less likely to see sf as something that you can be a fan or, or something that has a specific &#039;fandom&#039;, in Britain. But I have a suspicion that our concept of sf crystalised at the pulpier end of the spectrum after the sixties. Iain Banks famously adds an initial to his name to separate his sf from his mundane novels.

It&#039;d be interesting to compare the status of British crime fiction which has traditionally been more mundane than mundane writing. &#039;The English may not always be the best writers in the world, but they are incomparably the best dull writers&#039;, said Chandler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. That sounds possible. There was certainly a line of people like Wells, Huxley and Orwell who could write sf which was taken seriously by their contemporaries: you find Chesterton attempting to refute what he sees as Wells&#8217;s worldview, for example. As late as the sixties Lewis is claiming that the <em>Divine Comedy</em> is science fiction. I also think people are less likely to see sf as something that you can be a fan or, or something that has a specific &#8216;fandom&#8217;, in Britain. But I have a suspicion that our concept of sf crystalised at the pulpier end of the spectrum after the sixties. Iain Banks famously adds an initial to his name to separate his sf from his mundane novels.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be interesting to compare the status of British crime fiction which has traditionally been more mundane than mundane writing. &#8216;The English may not always be the best writers in the world, but they are incomparably the best dull writers&#8217;, said Chandler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuchlann</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuchlann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-226</guid>
		<description>@IKnight:  I do not know what they would do with it.  I mean, they all seem to love The Road, which is a post-apocalypse novel and thus SF.  The thing about genres is that they don&#039;t preclude being &quot;literary&quot; in the sense of &quot;talking issues common to literary fiction.&quot;  But said professors believe they do preclude just that.  

I see from wikipedia that &lt;i&gt;Never Let Me Go&lt;/i&gt; won the Arthur C. Clarke award, so the SF community accepted it as one of their own, at least.  More than that, without having read it or heard MFA types talk about it, I can&#039;t say.  The bare-bones plot summary on wikipedia makes it sound very SF.  

I have noticed that, outside the U.S., differences in &quot;genre&quot; and &quot;not-genre&quot; aren&#039;t as great.  J. G. Ballard and Anthony Burgess were SF writers who were well-respected in the &quot;literary&quot; community, though once you ask U.S. MFA types, they didn&#039;t write SF.  There was a bit of a row recently, when one of the American obituaries claimed that marking Ballard as a SF writer was insulting to his skill and work.  He said it was like &quot;calling &lt;i&gt;1984&lt;/i&gt; science fiction.&quot;  Which puzzled and irritated a lot of people, obviously.  

It&#039;s still a bit marked in Britain, but once one looks at some of the great SF writers from non-English-speaking countries, such as Poland (Stanislaw Lem) or Italy (Italo Calvino), no one seems to care.  Of course, that&#039;s an outsider&#039;s perspective, but there you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@IKnight:  I do not know what they would do with it.  I mean, they all seem to love The Road, which is a post-apocalypse novel and thus SF.  The thing about genres is that they don&#8217;t preclude being &#8220;literary&#8221; in the sense of &#8220;talking issues common to literary fiction.&#8221;  But said professors believe they do preclude just that.  </p>
<p>I see from wikipedia that <i>Never Let Me Go</i> won the Arthur C. Clarke award, so the SF community accepted it as one of their own, at least.  More than that, without having read it or heard MFA types talk about it, I can&#8217;t say.  The bare-bones plot summary on wikipedia makes it sound very SF.  </p>
<p>I have noticed that, outside the U.S., differences in &#8220;genre&#8221; and &#8220;not-genre&#8221; aren&#8217;t as great.  J. G. Ballard and Anthony Burgess were SF writers who were well-respected in the &#8220;literary&#8221; community, though once you ask U.S. MFA types, they didn&#8217;t write SF.  There was a bit of a row recently, when one of the American obituaries claimed that marking Ballard as a SF writer was insulting to his skill and work.  He said it was like &#8220;calling <i>1984</i> science fiction.&#8221;  Which puzzled and irritated a lot of people, obviously.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a bit marked in Britain, but once one looks at some of the great SF writers from non-English-speaking countries, such as Poland (Stanislaw Lem) or Italy (Italo Calvino), no one seems to care.  Of course, that&#8217;s an outsider&#8217;s perspective, but there you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IKnight</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>IKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-225</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a solid connection between Aesop and Richardson: Richardson published his own adaption of the &lt;em&gt;Fables&lt;/em&gt; ten days after he began to write &lt;em&gt;Pamela&lt;/em&gt;, and there are various explicit and implicit nods to them in the novel.

Do you know where people -- well, MFA professors -- would put something like Ishiguro&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Never Let Me Go&lt;/em&gt;? The premise, and the skeleton of the plot (which could be gripping, if the narrator didn&#039;t think it wasn&#039;t) could be &#039;genre&#039; fiction (and sf), but Ishiguro is supposed to write more &#039;literary&#039; fiction. And it has a moral, or at least &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=blog&amp;id=26272&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this person&lt;/a&gt; thinks it does (that piece contains spoilers -- and also claims that &lt;em&gt;NLMG&lt;/em&gt; is science fiction, and refers to &#039;genre writers&#039;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a solid connection between Aesop and Richardson: Richardson published his own adaption of the <em>Fables</em> ten days after he began to write <em>Pamela</em>, and there are various explicit and implicit nods to them in the novel.</p>
<p>Do you know where people &#8212; well, MFA professors &#8212; would put something like Ishiguro&#8217;s <em>Never Let Me Go</em>? The premise, and the skeleton of the plot (which could be gripping, if the narrator didn&#8217;t think it wasn&#8217;t) could be &#8216;genre&#8217; fiction (and sf), but Ishiguro is supposed to write more &#8216;literary&#8217; fiction. And it has a moral, or at least <a href="http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=blog&amp;id=26272" rel="nofollow">this person</a> thinks it does (that piece contains spoilers &#8212; and also claims that <em>NLMG</em> is science fiction, and refers to &#8216;genre writers&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Addendum to &#8220;Morals and Genre&#8221; &#171; Cuchlann</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>An Addendum to &#8220;Morals and Genre&#8221; &#171; Cuchlann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-223</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pontifus</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Pontifus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Nice overview of something that&#039;s generally on my mind in some form or another.

Yeah, &quot;mundane fiction&quot; is my favorite term for the stuff. &quot;Literary fiction&quot; is an irreconcilably stupid and personally offensive term, seemingly contrived to divide readers into upper and lower classes. It&#039;s an issue that brings my blood to such a boil that I don&#039;t usually bother trying to be fair and balanced about it, like I do with most things. So, clearly, my grad school professors are going to love me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice overview of something that&#8217;s generally on my mind in some form or another.</p>
<p>Yeah, &#8220;mundane fiction&#8221; is my favorite term for the stuff. &#8220;Literary fiction&#8221; is an irreconcilably stupid and personally offensive term, seemingly contrived to divide readers into upper and lower classes. It&#8217;s an issue that brings my blood to such a boil that I don&#8217;t usually bother trying to be fair and balanced about it, like I do with most things. So, clearly, my grad school professors are going to love me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghostlightning</title>
		<link>http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>ghostlightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuchlann.superfani.com/?p=247#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. Not much to add or comment. You organized and clarified quite a few things I&#039;ve been thinking about. I&#039;m gonna mull these over and mecha anime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. Not much to add or comment. You organized and clarified quite a few things I&#8217;ve been thinking about. I&#8217;m gonna mull these over and mecha anime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
